Los Angeles Edition
"Malibu to Palos Verdes"

Archive for April, 2010

Venice Art Walk: Art and Architecture Tour

 Rustic Canyon: The Sequel

Saturday, May 22, 2010

 Sponsored by DWELL

Picking up where last year’s historic walking tour left off, Leo Marmol, FAIA, takes visitors deeper into this architecturally bountiful neighborhood, stopping to tour a fresh collection of homes representing the old and the new.

Hours: 11:00 am to 4:00 pm
Registration: 10:30 am, Rustic Canyon Community Center, 601 Latimer Road, Santa Monica, free parking
Tickets: $175 per person, includes lunch, as well as private cocktail reception and tour preview led by architect Leo Marmol and historian Randy Young on Friday evening, May 21, at Marmol Radziner offices in West L.A. and VIP cocktail reception at Dogtown Station Lofts in Venice on Saturday evening, May 22. Tickets extremely limited and must be purchased in advance. Ticket buyers will receive confirmation prior to May 22.

Medow Residence
Medow Residence Marshall Lewis, Remodeled by Abramson Teiger ArchitectsArchitect Trevor Abramson designed two new entry doors for his remodel of this 1970s house — the first opens onto a lush garden, and the second, after a few steps, opens onto an airy, light filled living space with tall windows and doors leading out to the Canyon’s natural creek – another world in the middle of a bustling metropolis.
www.abramsonteiger.com

 

Amiel Residence
Amiel Residence Marshall Lewis, Remodeled by Tighe ArchitectureCascading stairs lead down to the new living space of this quintessential Rustic Canyon house, updated for the 21st century by Patrick Tighe, with a series of elegant floating volumes in a conjoined glass garden pavilion.
www.tighearchitecture.com

 

Stanton Residence
Stanton Residence Phil Rotblatt, Remodeled by Steve StantonA classic mid-century modern house, renovated and respectfully updated by the current owner / architect with materials that reflect the natural beauty of the canyon setting.
www.trashforteaching.org

 

Lunch at Melinda Gray’s historic Leo Carrillo Residence
Lunch at Melinda Gray’s historic Leo Carrillo Residence Renovated by Melinda Gray, Gray Matter ArchitectureThe Channel Road Adobe, built in 1932 for Leo Carrillo on an oak and sycamore filled plateau overlooking Santa Monica Canyon, has been painstakingly restored by architect Melinda Gray for her family; in the process, she has uncovered a waterfall, a pond, a spring, and a cistern.
www.graymatterarchitecture.com

 

Kingman House
Kingman House Rob Hussey with Gray Matter Architecture. A strikingly sculptural collaboration between designer/builder Rob Hussey and architect Melinda Gray, this house integrates nature, light, and volume, in a horizontally and vertically open plan with rich materials and finishes, handcrafted light fixtures, and a unique concrete wine wall.
www.graymatterarchitecture.com
www.husseyrealestategroup.com www.700kingman.com

 

Henrikson/Grant Residence
Henrikson/Grant Residence Marmol RadzinerThis serene, wood-clad home captures the beauty of clean, modernist design, and creates a warm and communal atmosphere with rooms that open onto each other and the garden, and materials and textures that bring nature indoors.
www.marmol-radziner.com

 

Shapiro Residence
Shapiro Residence Ray Kappe, FAIA, Kappe Architects/PlannersRevered architect Ray Kappe always amazes with his elegant structural solutions to difficult canyon sites, and this house is no exception, with its massive exposed concrete walls stepping up the hill, contrasting with narrow slot windows, clerestories, and floor-to-ceiling glass doors that open the house to the views, the trees, and expansive outdoor living areas.
http://www.kappedu.com/RayKappe.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note: This is a walking tour of approximately two miles with visits to homes with many stairs. Guests are advised to wear comfortable shoes and clothing.Click here to purchase tickets.   

Los Angeles Public School Rankings

Does Not include Santa Monica, Manhattan Beach, Culver City, and Beverly Hills as they their own are City

The median API score reports the 2008 test results posted by the school that falls exactly in the middle of the pack. California’s Academic Performance Index (API) combines several tests into a single number between 200 and 1000 for each school. The tests that make up the API and their weighting are listed on the California Department of Education website

In 2008, the average score statewide was 742. The state’s goal is for every school to reach 800. 

RANK NEIGHBORHOOD API TEST SCORES
1.  Hollywood Hills West 961
2.  Westwood 952
3.  Rancho Park 934
4.  Bel-Air 924
5.  Elysian Park 905
5.  West Los Angeles 905
7.  Encino 899
8.  Porter Ranch 886
9.  Brentwood 882
10.  Pacific Palisades 879
11.  West Hills 878
12.  Beverlywood 872
13.  Hancock Park 861
14.  Sherman Oaks 839
15.  Northridge 836
15.  Playa del Rey 836
17.  Eagle Rock 830
18.  Woodland Hills 826
19.  Mount Washington 825
19.  Valley Village 825
21.  Tarzana 824
22.  Studio City 817
23.  Sunland 816
24.  Elysian Valley 813
25.  Granada Hills 812
26.  Larchmont 800
26.  Westchester 800
28.  Mission Hills 795
29.  Palms 793
30.  Beverly Grove 791
31.  Silver Lake 788
32.  Chinatown 784
33.  Del Rey 783
34.  Hollywood Hills 780
34.  Mid-City 780
36.  Reseda 779
37.  Lake Balboa 777
38.  East Hollywood 772
39.  Playa Vista 771
39.  San Pedro 771
41.  Shadow Hills 763
42.  Atwater Village 762
42.  Carthay 762
42.  Toluca Lake 762
45.  Chatsworth 762
46.  North Hills 760
47.  Echo Park 755
48.  Venice 754
49.  Manchester Square 750
50.  Tujunga 749
51.  Lake View Terrace 746
51.  West Adams 746
53.  Highland Park 744
54.  Koreatown 740
55.  El Sereno 739
55.  Mid-Wilshire 739
57.  Harbor City 736
57.  Lincoln Heights 736
59.  Fairfax 734
59.  Winnetka 734
61.  Sawtelle 733
62.  Exposition Park 733
63.  Sylmar 732
64.  Harbor Gateway 730
64.  Montecito Heights 730
66.  University Park 727
67.  Valley Glen 726
68.  Downtown 724
68.  North Hollywood 724
70.  Glassell Park 723
70.  Los Feliz 723
72.  Van Nuys 722
73.  Panorama City 721
74.  Arleta 719
75.  Hollywood 718
75.  Westlake 718
77.  Harvard Heights 712
78.  Mar Vista 709
79.  Canoga Park 706
80.  Wilmington 703
81.  Cypress Park 697
82.  Adams-Normandie 691
83.  Boyle Heights 689
83.  Watts 689
85.  Pacoima 688
86.  Arlington Heights 687
87.  Sun Valley 685
87.  Vermont Vista 685
89.  Green Meadows 682
89.  Vermont Knolls 682
91.  Florence 680
91.  Jefferson Park 680
93.  Leimert Park 679
94.  Vermont-Slauson 679
95.  Pico-Union 677

 

Source: U.S. Census 2000California Department of Education 
Credits: Robert Browning, Stephanie Ferrell, Megan Garvey, Mark Hafer, Thomas Suh Lauder, David Lauter, Maloy MooreSandra PoindexterDoug SmithBen Welsh

State’s Home Default Cases Plunge

A 40.2% drop in the first quarter suggests that the foreclosure crisis is easing.

April 21, 2010  Alejandro Lazo   Copyright 2010 Los Angeles Times

The California foreclosure crisis appears to be abating, new data show, as the federal government and big lenders step up efforts to keep troubled borrowers in their homes.

Mortgage default notices — the first step toward foreclosure — plunged 40.2% statewide in the first three months of the year compared with the same period in 2009, according to San Diego research firm MDA DataQuick.

Foreclosure sales dropped 1.7% from a year earlier and 16.1% from the last three months of 2009, DataQuick said Tuesday.

The numbers suggest that the housing market won’t be flooded by a fresh wave of bank repossessions, which had been seen as a major threat to the market’s recovery.

“It is surprisingly good news,” said Gerd-Ulf Krueger, principal economist at Housingecon.com. “There is still a lot of supply lurking out there, but at this point, it looks like it is pretty much under control.”

Stuart A. Gabriel, director of UCLA’s Ziman Center for Real Estate, said the declining foreclosure numbers are “consistent with a broad range of indicators that are suggestive of not only a healing economy but the beginning of healing in the housing market.”

Southern California home prices jumped 14% in March from the same month a year ago, to a median $285,000.

Even so, economists note that further gains statewide are jeopardized by continued high unemployment, particularly in the Inland Empire and the Central Valley.

Foreclosure activity remains concentrated in these inland areas, which suffer from above-average unemployment. DataQuick said mortgages were most likely to go into default in Merced, Stanislaus and San Joaquin counties. Defaults were least likely in the Bay Area counties of Marin, San Francisco and San Mateo.

“In coastal California, things are looking pretty decent,” said Richard Green, director of the USC Lusk Center for Real Estate. “I still think if you get into the Inland Empire, Fresno, Bakersfield, Modesto, people are really struggling because the unemployment rate is so high — so that people just need help to get out from under.”

California loan default notices peaked at 135,431 in the first quarter of 2009. Since then, the federal government has put increasing pressure on banks to work with homeowners behind on their payments. At the same time, experts say, banks have recognized that flooding the market with foreclosures weakens the value of the properties they have taken back and must resell.

Great News- Market Update-Things are continuing to improve!

From Scott Gibson

 Great news-things are continuing to improve! Believe in it!

Data Watch


Retail sales soared 1.6% in March To view this article, Click Here
Brian S. Wesbury – Chief Economist
Robert Stein, CFA – Senior Economist
Date: 4/14/2010

Retail sales soared 1.6% in March while sales excluding autos gained 0.6%, both beating consensus expectations. Including upward revisions to January/February, retail sales increased 2.1% overall and 0.9% excluding autos.

                                           

In the past six months, retail sales are up at an 11.7% annual rate while sales ex-autos are up at an 8.4% rate.

 

Almost every major category of sales increased in March. The strongest increases were for autos, building materials, and clothing. The only one to show a decline was gas, a category usually driven by price changes, not volume.

 

Sales excluding autos, building materials, and gas were up 0.5% in March (0.9% with revisions) and up at a 6.7% annual rate in the past six months. This calculation is important for estimating GDP.

 

Implications:  Today’s report should prove once and for all that the consumer is not dead, is not on life support, and certainly doesn’t need special government assistance. Including revisions to prior months, retail sales were up 2.1% in March. Some of the gain may be due to Easter, which floats from year to year, making it hard for the government to seasonally-adjust. But the underlying upward trend is unmistakable. Last summer, during cash-for-clunkers, many analysts said gains in retail were temporary.  They thought consumption would slump once the incentive program ended.  But retail sales are now up at an 11.7% annual rate in the past six months, after the program ended. Retail sales were up at a 7.9% annual rate in Q1 versus the Q4 average. These figures suggest “real” consumer spending, which means inflation-adjusted and including services, should be up at a 4%+ annual rate in Q1. Most importantly, the gains in sales are broadening out. For example, building materials are up in four of the last five months, a positive sign that home construction is picking up, perhaps leading to some hiring by residential builders. Consumer spending is growing for two major reasons. First, while debt is still declining, the pace of the reduction in debt is slowing. Second, incomes are growing and recovering while booming markets are boosting confidence about future income. The V-shaped recovery train has left the station. Now it’s time to sit back and watch other investors catch up.


This information contains forward-looking statements about various economic trends and strategies. You are cautioned that such forward-looking statements are subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and actual results could be materially different. There are no guarantees associated with any forecast and the opinions stated here are subject to change at any time and are the opinion of the individual strategist. Data comes from the following sources: Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Federal Reserve Board, and Haver Analytics. Data is taken from sources generally believed to be reliable but no guarantee is given to its accuracy.

Brief Window For Tax Credits

House and money$18,000 IN COMBINED HOMEBUYER TAX CREDITS FOR A LIMITED TIME

Californians have a brief window of opportunity to receive up to $18,000 in combined federal and state homebuyer tax credits.  To take advantage of both tax credits, a first-time homebuyer must enter into a purchase contract for a principal residence before May 1, 2010, and close escrow between May 1, 2010 and June 30, 2010, inclusive.  Buyers who are not first-time homebuyers may use the same timeframes to receive up to $16,500 in combined tax credits if they are long-time residents of their existing homes as permitted under federal law, and they purchase properties that have never been previously occupied as provided under California law.

Under the federal law slated to soon expire, a first-time homebuyer may receive up to $8,000 in tax credits, and a long-time resident may receive up to $6,500, for certain purchase contracts entered into by April 30, 2010 that close escrow by June 30, 2010.  Additionally, under a newly enacted California law, a homebuyer may receive up to $10,000 in tax credits as a first-time homebuyer or buyer of a property that has never been occupied.  The new California law applies to certain purchases that close escrow on or after May 1, 2010 (see Cal. Rev. & Tax Code section 17059.1(a)(4)).  California law generally allows buyers of never-occupied properties to reserve their credits before closing escrow, but buyers seeking to combine the federal and state tax credits will not be able to satisfy the timing requirements for such reservations (see Cal. Rev. & Tax Code section 17059.1(c)(1)(A)).  Other terms and restrictions apply to both tax credits.

For more information, C.A.R. offers a Homebuyer Tax Credit Chart with a side-by-side summary of the federal and California laws.  C.A.R. also offers a legal article entitled Homebuyer Tax Credit Update.

C.A.R. provides REALTORS® with many other legal articles covering a wide range of topics of interest.  Some of the new or newly revised legal articles available at http://qa.car.org